Mike Johnston, The Online Photographer, doesnâ€™t think so. And the reason has to with the way lenses are coated.
He says lens coatings are relatively more important to lens performance than most photographers realize. Digital SLRs require different lens coatings than film SLRs.
Coatings are used to protect the lens from stray light, chiefly from light that bounces back to the exit pupil of a lens; not much light bounces back from a piece of film while thereâ€™s more from a digital sensor. And here lies the difference.
â€œThis is the reason why you may be naggingly underwhelmed by the optical performance of, say, that older AF 28mm Æ’/2.8 you bought to use as a “normal” lens for your DSLR,â€ Mike writes.
But itâ€™s also the reason that sometimes film-camera lenses work better for digital if they were made to a higher standard in the first place. For example, film-era Leica lenses are already “coated for digital” just because they were well-coated, period.
Is Mike right? What is your own experience with using film SLR lenses on digital SLR cameras?